Residents Reject Glades Road ‘Exercise Zone’ Proposal Following Public Safety Objections
Key Points
- Proposed <q>exercise zone</q> from 101 to 163 Glades Road was rejected.
- Public safety officials warned the proposal would create significant liability and safety risks.
- The Select Board stated there is no current intent to add more parking beyond existing lifeguard spots.
- Residents expressed ongoing concern over neighborhood inclusion in coastal traffic planning.
A contentious petitioner’s article to create a permanent walking, running, and biking exercise zone
on Glades Road was defeated at Town Meeting. The petitioner, Kyle O'Connor, argued that the Select Board’s 2025 decision to add parking stalls along the seawall prioritized cars over people
and compromised the safety of a road heavily used by children and dog walkers. O'Connor’s motion sought to remove parking stalls, lower the speed limit to 15 miles per hour, and remove road striping installed by the town.
Select Board member Dr. Nico (Athen Osenko) reported that the Select Board, Fire, Police, and Advisory Board were all unanimously opposed to the article. The primary reason is safety and liability,
Dr. Nico said, explaining that the exercise zone
statute was never intended for public roads shared with motorized vehicles. She further argued that the town’s current striping actually provides a safer pedestrian transit area and that removing it would create more confusion and liability for the town.
Resident Kristen Degavilla attempted to save a portion of the article through an amendment that would focus solely on prohibiting parking beyond the existing four lifeguard spots. However, Dr. Nico countered that the amendment was unvetted and still utilized the problematic exercise zone
terminology. The amendment failed, and the main motion was subsequently defeated by a majority voice vote, leaving the current Glades Road traffic and parking configuration in place.